🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

Based on recent research, typical households spends $27,000 annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.