🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing group of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to approve a bill raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a useful first step," stated the European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on strong research".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to harmful platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and suitable for children," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, regulation is largely unfolding at the regional government level amid federal inaction.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some individuals to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, further nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies strike a more measured position. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might backfire". The body notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

As this global debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and several other countries show that policymakers around the world are less and less prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.